Topics

Plant Disease Diagnosis: Moving Out of the Lab and Into the Field
ELISA Diagnostic Kits
Direct Tissue Blotting
Nucleic Acid Probes
Summary


[Topics]

Plant Disease Diagnosis: Moving Out of the Lab and Into the Field


The first and most important step in managing a plant disease is to correctly identify it. Although some diseases can be diagnosed quickly by visual examination, others require laboratory testing for diagnosis. These laboratory procedures may take days or even weeks to complete and are, in some cases, relatively insensitive. Delays are frustrating when a quick diagnosis is needed so that appropriate disease control measures may be taken to prevent plant injury, especially when high value cash crops, turf grass, or ornamentals are at stake.

Fortunately, as the result of advances in biotechnology, new products and techniques are becoming available that will complement or replace time-consuming laboratory procedures. Many products already are available for use, while others are still in developmental stages. Some procedures require laboratory equipment and training, while other procedures can be performed on site by a person with no specialized training.

[Topics]

ELISA Diagnostic Kits


A number of disease detection kits have been developed for use at the site where a disease is suspected. These kits, which in most cases do not require laboratory equipment, are especially useful to growers. Some tests only take five minutes to perform.

The diagnostic kits are based on a method that uses proteins called antibodies to detect disease-causing organisms of plants (plant pathogens). The technique used is called ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). This assay is based on the ability of an antibody to recognize and bind to a specific antigen, a substance associated with a plant pathogen. The process is illustrated in figure 1.

The antibodies used in the diagnostic kits are highly purified proteins produced by injecting a warm-blooded animal (like a rabbit) with an antigen associated with one particular plant disease (1). The animal reacts to the antigen and produces antibodies (2). The antibodies produced recognize and react only with the proteins associated with the causal agent of that plant disease.

These antibodies are bound to a plastic plate or similar detector unit in a test kit. The individual running the test prepares the plant sample by grinding it between two pieces of abrasive paper. The ground plant sample is placed in a bottle filled with an extraction liquid. This liquid is then placed in wells in the plastic plate (3). If the disease-causing organism (pathogen) is present in the sample, the specific antibodies in the plastic plate will bind to pathogen-associated proteins and adhere to the unit (4a). A second antibody is added that also reacts with the pathogen-associated proteins. This antibody is special because it can react with color-producing chemicals called reagents (5a). Color changes on the unit's surface indicate a positive (disease present) reaction. If no pathogen-associated proteins are present (4b), the detector antibodies cannot bind to the color carrying reagents and are washed away (5b).

At the present time, a limited number of these onsite disease detection kits are available. Many ELISA diagnostic kits are available for use in the laboratory, however, and can test for a wide range of plant pathogens. Examples of diseases ELISA kits can detect include bacterial canker of tomato, soybean root rot, and bacterial blight of geranium.

[Topics]

Direct Tissue Blotting


Another diagnostic assay that also uses specific antibodies as a detection tool is known as direct tissue blotting. With this technique, the location of a disease-causing pathogen within the host plant can be determined, allowing earlier detection and a better understanding of how a disease progresses through a plant.

Host plant tissue is pressed onto a special piece of paper. Antibodies that bind only to the disease-causing pathogen in question are then introduced to this paper. A color change indicates a positive result and shows the location of the pathogen in the host tissue (figure 2).

[Topics]

Nucleic Acid Probes


Another set of tools that can be used in plant disease diagnostics is nucleic acid probes. These probes are fragments of nucleic acid arranged in a sequence complementary to that of the DNA or RNA of the disease-causing pathogen. Because the sequences complement each other, the probes can be used to identify specific diseases.

Squash Blot Method


A method that uses nucleic acid probe technology is known as the squash blot method (figure 3).This technology is similar to direct tissue blotting. Tissue from a plant that is suspected to be diseased is "squashed" onto a special piece of paper, called a membrane (1). This membrane is then treated with a probe (2) that can bind or hybridize with nucleic acid of the plant pathogen suspected to be in the plant tissue. Hybridization or binding will occur when like sequences are present (3). After adding several more substances to the membrane, a color reaction (4) indicates that the probe and pathogen nucleic acid sequences have hybridized and the disease is present. No color reaction means the test for the disease is negative.

PCR


A new technology, PCR (polymerase chain reaction) has great potential for raising the sensitivity of various assays that use nucleic acid probes. PCR is used to produce enormous numbers of copies of a specified nucleic acid sequence. This technique can allow the detection of very small amounts of a pathogen in a sample by amplifying the pathogen sequences to a detectable level.

[Topics]

Summary


The methods described here are examples of applications of biotechnology to the field of plant disease diagnostics. As these techniques are further developed and refined, they will enhance the ability to detect and identify a variety of plant diseases. In addition to providing new diagnostic tools, these methods will also speed the process of disease diagnosis.


Written by Paula H. Flynn, extension associate, Iowa State University. Edited by Glenda D. Webber, Iowa State University, Office of Biotechnology.

References


"New Fungal Root Disease Detection Kits May Revolutionize Your Disease Control Decisions" by James MacDonald. In Grower Talks, February 1992, p. 73-79.

"New Rapid Diagnostic Tests" by Dr. Sally Miller. In Ag Consultant, fall 1991, p. 16-17.

"Quick Test Kits for Growers" by John Guerard. In American Vegetable Grower, vol. 38, December 1990, p. 37-38.

North Central Regional Extension Publications are subject to peer review and prepared as a part of the Cooperative Extension activities of the 13 land-grant universities of the 12 North Central States, in cooperation with the Extension Service - U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. The following universities cooperated in making this publication available.

University of Illinois
69 Mumford Hall
1301 W. Gregory Drive
Urbana, IL 61801
217-333-2007

Kansas State University
Umberger Hall
Manhattan, KS 66506
913-532-5830

South Dakota State University
Ag. Comm. Center
Box 2231
Brookings, SD 57007
605-688-5628

* Iowa State University
119 Printing & Publ. Bldg.
Ames, IA 50011-1050
515-294-5247

University of Nebraska
Dept. of Ag. Communications
Lincoln, NE 68583-0918
402-472-3023

* Publishing state

For copies of this and other North Central Regional Extension Publications, write to: Publications Office, Cooperative Extension Service, in care of the university listed above for your state. If they do not have copies or your university is not listed above, contact the publishing university as marked with an asterisk.

Programs and activities of the cooperative Extension Service are available to all potential clientele without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion or disability.

In cooperation with NCR Educational Materials Project

Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Cooperative Extension Services of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota and Wisconsin. Robert M. Anderson, Jr., Director, Cooperative Extension Service, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.

March, 1994


North Central Regional
Extension Publication
NCR#492