
Topics
Plant Disease Diagnosis: Moving Out
of the Lab and Into the Field
ELISA Diagnostic Kits
Direct Tissue Blotting
Nucleic Acid Probes
Summary
[Topics]
Plant Disease Diagnosis: Moving Out of the Lab and Into the Field
The first and most important step in managing a plant disease is to correctly
identify it. Although some diseases can be diagnosed quickly by visual examination,
others require laboratory testing for diagnosis. These laboratory procedures
may take days or even weeks to complete and are, in some cases, relatively
insensitive. Delays are frustrating when a quick diagnosis is needed so
that appropriate disease control measures may be taken to prevent plant
injury, especially when high value cash crops, turf grass, or ornamentals
are at stake.
Fortunately, as the result of advances in biotechnology, new products and
techniques are becoming available that will complement or replace time-consuming
laboratory procedures. Many products already are available for use, while
others are still in developmental stages. Some procedures require laboratory
equipment and training, while other procedures can be performed on site
by a person with no specialized training.
[Topics]
ELISA Diagnostic Kits
A number of disease detection kits have been developed for use at the
site where a disease is suspected. These kits, which in most cases do not
require laboratory equipment, are especially useful to growers. Some tests
only take five minutes to perform.
The diagnostic kits are based on a method that uses proteins called antibodies
to detect disease-causing organisms of plants (plant pathogens). The technique
used is called ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). This assay is
based on the ability of an antibody to recognize and bind to a specific
antigen, a substance associated with a plant pathogen. The process is illustrated
in figure 1.
The antibodies used in the diagnostic kits are highly purified proteins
produced by injecting a warm-blooded animal (like a rabbit) with an antigen
associated with one particular plant disease (1). The animal reacts
to the antigen and produces antibodies (2). The antibodies produced
recognize and react only with the proteins associated with the causal agent
of that plant disease.
These antibodies are bound to a plastic plate or similar detector unit in
a test kit. The individual running the test prepares the plant sample by
grinding it between two pieces of abrasive paper. The ground plant sample
is placed in a bottle filled with an extraction liquid. This liquid is then
placed in wells in the plastic plate (3). If the disease-causing
organism (pathogen) is present in the sample, the specific antibodies in
the plastic plate will bind to pathogen-associated proteins and adhere to
the unit (4a). A second antibody is added that also reacts with the
pathogen-associated proteins. This antibody is special because it can react
with color-producing chemicals called reagents (5a). Color changes
on the unit's surface indicate a positive (disease present) reaction. If
no pathogen-associated proteins are present (4b), the detector antibodies
cannot bind to the color carrying reagents and are washed away (5b).
At the present time, a limited number of these onsite disease detection
kits are available. Many ELISA diagnostic kits are available for use in
the laboratory, however, and can test for a wide range of plant pathogens.
Examples of diseases ELISA kits can detect include bacterial canker of tomato,
soybean root rot, and bacterial blight of geranium.
[Topics]
Direct Tissue Blotting
Another diagnostic assay that also uses specific antibodies as a detection
tool is known as direct tissue blotting. With this technique, the location
of a disease-causing pathogen within the host plant can be determined, allowing
earlier detection and a better understanding of how a disease progresses
through a plant.
Host plant tissue is pressed onto a special piece of paper. Antibodies that
bind only to the disease-causing pathogen in question are then introduced
to this paper. A color change indicates a positive result and shows the
location of the pathogen in the host tissue (figure
2).
[Topics]
Nucleic Acid Probes
Another set of tools that can be used in plant disease diagnostics is nucleic
acid probes. These probes are fragments of nucleic acid arranged in a sequence
complementary to that of the DNA or RNA of the disease-causing pathogen.
Because the sequences complement each other, the probes can be used to identify
specific diseases.
Squash Blot Method
A method that uses nucleic acid probe technology is known as the squash
blot method (figure 3).This technology
is similar to direct tissue blotting. Tissue from a plant that is suspected
to be diseased is "squashed" onto a special piece of paper, called
a membrane (1). This membrane is then treated with a probe (2)
that can bind or hybridize with nucleic acid of the plant pathogen suspected
to be in the plant tissue. Hybridization or binding will occur when like
sequences are present (3). After adding several more substances to
the membrane, a color reaction (4) indicates that the probe and pathogen
nucleic acid sequences have hybridized and the disease is present. No color
reaction means the test for the disease is negative.
PCR
A new technology, PCR (polymerase chain reaction) has great potential for
raising the sensitivity of various assays that use nucleic acid probes.
PCR is used to produce enormous numbers of copies of a specified nucleic
acid sequence. This technique can allow the detection of very small amounts
of a pathogen in a sample by amplifying the pathogen sequences to a detectable
level.
[Topics]
Summary
The methods described here are examples of applications of biotechnology
to the field of plant disease diagnostics. As these techniques are further
developed and refined, they will enhance the ability to detect and identify
a variety of plant diseases. In addition to providing new diagnostic tools,
these methods will also speed the process of disease diagnosis.
Written by Paula H. Flynn, extension associate, Iowa State University.
Edited by Glenda D. Webber, Iowa State University, Office of Biotechnology.
References
"New Fungal Root Disease Detection Kits May Revolutionize Your Disease
Control Decisions" by James MacDonald. In Grower Talks, February 1992,
p. 73-79.
"New Rapid Diagnostic Tests" by Dr. Sally Miller. In Ag Consultant,
fall 1991, p. 16-17.
"Quick Test Kits for Growers" by John Guerard. In American Vegetable
Grower, vol. 38, December 1990, p. 37-38.
North Central Regional Extension Publications are subject to peer review
and prepared as a part of the Cooperative Extension activities of the 13
land-grant universities of the 12 North Central States, in cooperation with
the Extension Service - U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
The following universities cooperated in making this publication available.
University of Illinois
69 Mumford Hall
1301 W. Gregory Drive
Urbana, IL 61801
217-333-2007
Kansas State University
Umberger Hall
Manhattan, KS 66506
913-532-5830
South Dakota State University
Ag. Comm. Center
Box 2231
Brookings, SD 57007
605-688-5628
* Iowa State University
119 Printing & Publ. Bldg.
Ames, IA 50011-1050
515-294-5247
University of Nebraska
Dept. of Ag. Communications
Lincoln, NE 68583-0918
402-472-3023
* Publishing state
For copies of this and other North Central Regional Extension Publications,
write to: Publications Office, Cooperative Extension Service, in care of
the university listed above for your state. If they do not have copies or
your university is not listed above, contact the publishing university as
marked with an asterisk.
Programs and activities of the cooperative Extension Service are available
to all potential clientele without regard to race, color, national origin,
age, sex, religion or disability.
In cooperation with NCR Educational Materials Project
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of Congress of
May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture
and Cooperative Extension Services of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan,
Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota and Wisconsin.
Robert M. Anderson, Jr., Director, Cooperative Extension Service, Iowa State
University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
March, 1994

North Central Regional
Extension Publication
NCR#492